Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Naomi Osaka vs Patricia Maria Tig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Osaka vs Tig analysis and find out who is favored!
Naomi Osaka vs Patricia Maria Tig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Osaka 2 - 0 Tig
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Osaka has won 51.09% of points on their second serve, while Tig has won 46.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Osaka, in recent form, has won 52.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tig has won 61.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.26% and 44.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Osaka has saved 60.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tig has saved 55.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Osaka has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 13/ 10), with Tig winning 52.63% (W/L 20/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Osaka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 203/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 210/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Osaka has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5), where as Tig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82.35% of matches (W/L 14/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Osaka winning 2 times and Tig being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Osaka winning 4 and Tig winning 1. The last match between Osaka and Tig was at the French Open - Paris, 30-05-2021, First, Clay with Naomi Osaka getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Osaka and Tig have played a deciding set 1 times, with Osaka winning 1 times and Tig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Osaka winning 1, and Tig 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Osaka has played against opponents with an average rank of 67.22 while Tig has played against players with an average rank of 165.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Osaka has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tig has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Osaka has converted 40.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tig has converted 54.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
125
Rank
1
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
443
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
64% (297-165)
Career Total W/L
62% (333-201)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
69% (11-5)
$21,444,160
Career Prize Money
$584,816
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Naomi Osaka | Patricia Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 31 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:39 | 1:59:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (76/147) | 53% (104/195) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (64/76) | 63% (65/104) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (39/71) | 46% (42/91) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 28% (8/29) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (88/195) | 30% (44/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Naomi Osaka
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Naomi Osaka | Patricia Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 69% (11/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (29/21) | 73% (24/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (273/236) | 57% (170/129) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 69% (11/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 173 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:19 | 2:1:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 67.22 | 75.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (872/1606) | 55% (548/988) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (653/872) | 61% (336/548) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (375/734) | 46% (204/440) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (68/168) | 55% (77/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (656/1647) | 51% (509/996) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (10/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 73% (11/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Naomi Osaka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Naomi Osaka
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(1) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Naomi Osaka
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Daria Kasatkina
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Marta Kostyuk
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Naomi Osaka
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Greetje Minnen
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Naomi Osaka
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Yulia Putintseva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
15
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Briana Szabo
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Ada Piestrzynska
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Alexia Iulia Marginean
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
75%
(
79 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Bianca Bulat
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Vanessa Georgiana Popa Teiusanu
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kristiana Sidorova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Osaka Vs Tig Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Osaka are available here and Tig photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Naomi Osaka
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
